Bank of America Corp. is currently embroiled in legal challenges due to its practices around overdraft fees and allegations of breaking promises to provide financial relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. This controversy has led to a $75 million preliminary settlement over multiple overdraft fees and a lawsuit concerning the bank’s pandemic response.
Overdraft Fee Settlement
Bank of America has agreed to a $75 million preliminary settlement for charging multiple overdraft fees on single transactions for checking and savings accounts. Overdraft fees, charged when customers attempt purchases without sufficient funds, have been a lucrative source of income for banks, totaling $12.4 billion in 2020. However, these fees have drawn criticism for disproportionately impacting lower-income customers and contributing to account closures. Unlike some banks that have waived or eliminated these fees, Bank of America faced accusations of charging multiple fees on retried payments without customer consent, leading to significant financial burdens on affected customers.
Pandemic Fee Lawsuit Advances
Simultaneously, Bank of America faces a potential class-action lawsuit over allegations that it reneged on promises to provide customers with relief from overdraft and insufficient fund fees during the COVID-19 pandemic’s peak. The U. S. District Court of the Northern District of California denied the bank’s request to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint, allowing the lawsuit to move forward. The plaintiffs argue that Bank of America prematurely ended its Client Assistance Program, which was launched to support customers during the pandemic by refunding overdraft fees and deferring loan and credit card payments. The lawsuit argues Bank of America ended this program without proper notification to its customers.
Legal Implications and Customer Impact
The ongoing lawsuit emphasizes the disconnect between Bank of America’s advertised pandemic relief efforts and its actual practices. Plaintiffs allege they were misled into incurring fees with the expectation of refunds under the assistance program, which the bank quietly discontinued. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers highlighted the plausibility of deceptive practices by not formally disclosing the program’s end while continuing to promise case-by-case refunds.
The Broader Context
These legal challenges come as the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is pushing to curb overdraft fees across large banks, potentially saving consumers billions annually. The outcome of these lawsuits against Bank of America could set important precedents for banking practices and consumer protection in the financial sector.
Bank of America’s legal troubles spotlight ongoing concerns about banking fees and the need for transparency and fairness in financial services, especially during times of crisis. The decision will likely influence how banks approach overdraft fees and pandemic-related financial relief moving forward, impacting millions of consumers across the country.
Related Resources:
Filing a Consumer Complaint About a Bank (FindLaw’s Learn About the Law)
Bank Records and Financial Privacy Laws (FindLaw’s Learn About the Law)
Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank NA (2012) (FindLaw’s Case Law)
The post Bank of America Faces Legal Challenges Over Overdraft Fees and Pandemic Relief Promises appeared first on .